Address by Shri M. Hamid Ansari, Vice-President of India and Chairman, Rajya Sabha at the inaugural ceremony of the 53rd CPA Conference on 25th September 2007 at Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi


New Delhi | September 25, 2007

Hon’ble Rashtrapatiji

Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha and President of the CPA

Vice-President of the CPA

Chairman, CPA Executive Committee

President of the Commonwealth Women Parliamentarians Secretary-General of the Commonwealth

Secretary-General of the CPA

Distinguished Delegates

Excellencies

Ladies and Gentlemen

Today India is hosting the Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference for the fourth time and on behalf of the people of India and on my own behalf, I welcome our distinguished guests who have come from different parts of the Commonwealth to attend this 53rd Conference.

As members of the Commonwealth, we share a bond and an affinity. The Indian perception of it was enunciated by our first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, in 1949 after he attended a meeting of heads of government of Commonwealth countries in London:

“It has been India’s privilege in the past to be a meeting place for many cultures. It may be her privilege in the present and the future to be a bridge to join warring factions and to help in maintaining that most urgent thing of today and the future – the peace of the world. It is in the belief that India could more effectively pursue this policy of encouraging peace and freedom and of lessening the bitter hatreds and tensions in the world that I willingly agreed to the London agreement.”

The focus of the Indian effort, as a member of the Commonwealth, has thus been on “encouraging peace and freedom” in the world. The confluence of this with the theme of the present Conference – delivering democracy and sustainable development – is evident. The concepts of freedom, peace, democracy, and sustainable development are not independent variables in the societal calculus; instead, each depends on the others to sustain and energize itself.

Parliamentarians, so visible in this audience, represent the spirit of democracy. The question of the meaning and content of democracy has been on the national and the global agenda for some time and has generated lively debates. A measure of agreement has been arrived at in regard to its working hypothesis and its institutions; some critical questions, however, remain to be settled:

  • The first of these pertains to the emergence of democracy in individual societies. Does it evolve autonomously on internal impulses or can it be grafted or transplanted?
  • Secondly, how do we ensure that the norms of democratic governance are implemented both in letter and in spirit? Discussion, said Pericles, is “an indispensable preliminary to any wise action”. Nehru had noted that the parliamentary system of government is based on criticism and had acknowledged the need for “stout critics”. Do parliamentary systems shy away from it occasionally?
  • Thirdly, and in the knowledge that institutions are operated by men and women, the question posed by Harold Laski eight decades earlier remains valid to this day: “The problem of democratic government is not less a problem of finding men apt to the use of its machinery than the problem of a monarchy is to a race of kings fitted by their endowments to benefit the State”.
  • Finally, and given the global integration that is underway, the question of the external environment in its positive and negative dimensions remains relevant. Has the commitment to democratic norms in individual societies found its reflection in adequate measure in the global community? “A theory of legitimate power”, wrote the political scientist David Held in 1991 “is inescapably a theory of democracy in the interlocking processes and structure of the global system. It is the theory of democratic state within the global order and the theory of the impact of the global order on the democratic state”.

In the final analysis, democracy is about participatory and accountable governance, based on the rule of law. Within this framework, experience has varied from polity to polity; each is of relevance in local terms and therefore needs to be respected.

Structures of governance are one aspect of the matter; delivery is another. Democratic governance must therefore impact meaningfully on the public in its daily life, in its quest for physical and economic security, on ways and means of ensuring better living standards.

The agenda of this Conference, I understand, dwells on various aspects of sustainable development and environmental protection. Governments the world over have finally started taking note of climate change and global warming that affect all of us. The time has come for Parliamentarians, especially in the developing world, to take greater interest and acquaint themselves with the technical, and often political, aspects of these global problems. They have an essential role in engaging and informing the public on these issues.

Ladies and gentlemen

Success of democracy is one of India’s most significant achievements. It is a great honour for India that a separate regional status has been accorded to it within the CPA. It is also a matter of pride that Shri Hashim Abdul Halim is the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the CPA, under whose able and inspiring leadership, the Association has been making concerted efforts towards the realization of the noble objectives of the Commonwealth.

Distinguished delegates

The greatest challenge before all of us today is how to make our parliamentary institutions relevant in this era of globalisation. The new global world order has to be built on the tenets of equity, harmony, tolerance, diversity and pluralism. Parliamentary institutions all over the world are under pressure to meet the challenges of sustainable development, inclusive growth and good governance.

The answer lies in seeking to strengthen, and deepen, the norms of participation and of accountability. This would necessitate an enabling social, economic, political and legal environment that would induce every section of the society to participate in greater measure in the processes of governance and development. This, in turn, would demand that democracy be imbued with a spirit of openness, accountability and transparency, with wider inclusiveness, devolution and decentralisation of power. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that nobody is left behind in this era of globalisation.

I wish you every success in your deliberations.

Thank you.